Jump to content

D3agl3-Cross- I'm not an Addict

TTT VIP
  • Content Count

    463
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

D3agl3-Cross- I'm not an Addict last won the day on June 17 2019

D3agl3-Cross- I'm not an Addict had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

57 Main G

About D3agl3-Cross- I'm not an Addict

  • Birthday 04/01/1986

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Oshawa ON
  • Interests
    reading, music, games.
  • Steam Information
    https://steamcommunity.com/id/D3agl3-Cross-/

Recent Profile Visitors

573 profile views
  1. The evidence is clear and the player in question has been playing on the servers more than long enough to know that you can not kos off location or sound. You stated you heard loads of gunshots and went up stairs to see the complainant with a dead body. Watching the longer video there are no gun shots at all. There was really no reason for you to KOS off sound, or off a dead body. The player in question switf moat.gg Admin STEAM_0:0:68007373 Will receive a 7 day ban for Purp rdm 3rd offense. Be careful out there.
  2. @Doc O'malley If there's nothing else you can provide to add some context to at least that report screen shot, I'll have to conclude that there isn't enough evidence and close and archive this report.
  3. I have been unable to get into contact with the player in question @Remnus Kizon Can you prove who won the vs's games? And why exactly is this so convoluted? He gave you a gun. And if he wins he trades you back 30k for the gun?
  4. The player in question has failed to respond to my friend request and I will be forced to conclude this report without their input. The evidence shown in the SS's of the death scene shows that ten seconds passed between the two incidents and there was no way the player in question could have possibly seen what happened to the inno that was murdered below him. That being said the player in question is fairly new and has only been playing on the moat servers for a little over a week, has zero slays from what I can tell, and no prior bans. For this reason the player Pooh STEAM_0:1:510151226 Will receive a Slay for acc rdm (we do not KOS off sound or location) and a firm prompt to please review the rules in the F3 menu. Be careful out there.
  5. So here is how this works. If someone KOS's you in game, and you are an inno, you KOS them, you go find them, and you prove you are inno. If another inno follows the false KOS and kills you it is not their fault, you need to report the person who falsed KOS you. So how that works is, if the person was a traitor at the time, nothing. It's an acceptable traitor tactic. If the person was inno or a detective, and they seen you doing something traitorous then that's on you. If it was a mistake because they tried to tag someone else it's on them to call it off, to type in chat it was a false kos. If they do none of these things, then it is punishable. Closed and Archived.
  6. @maxreportskids So what you are saying is, that EVEN THOUGH you've been playing on moat servers since may, that you STILL don't know you can't KOS off location or sound? Or that you have to at least ask someone to ID the body?
  7. Roamology doesn't actually say anything in any of the screen shots you provided. There is a report screen and it states he killed you, but he didn't say anything in chat. @Doc O'malley
  8. I have been unable to get into contact with the player in question and will be forced to conclude this report without their input. The evidence is pretty clear on this. The player in question admits to doing it because the complainant was standing still. I have no idea why someone would think that's a rule, or in what context it would ever be acceptable For these reasons the player JT XD STEAM_0:0:188082628 Will receive a 1 day ban for purp rdm 1st offense Be careful out there.
  9. After reviewing the evidence and confirming with the admins I can assure you that you may not KOS off of a live check. Now I know this is a common belief in the community and there is a lot of ambiguity behind this, as its not stated explicitly in the rules anywhere but you now know this. As the player is fairly new, has no priors, and due to the confusion of this overall belief I don't feel that this was purp rdm, I feel the player in question thought he was justified in his kill due solely to the fact of this common belief. For these reasons the player roamology moat.gg STEAM_0:1:197216416 Will receive a Slay for acc rdm (you may not KoS off a live check) Be careful out there.
  10. After reviewing the evidence it seems like the player in question did not realize you can not kill someone because you think they set off a T trap. As this isn't specifically listed in the rules I can understand how it could be mistaken as a justified killing but I assure you it is not. This is the same as killing off suspicion and is directly against our rules For this reason the player Crz108 moat.gg STEAM_0:0:461767556 Will receive a Slay for acc rdm. You may not kill someone because you think or know they set off a T trap. T traps can be accessed through walls, doorways, floors etc... and can be accessed from quite a distance away. Be careful out there.
  11. Mass rdm is defined as 3+ kills, this only shows two kills The player in question has been contacted via steam friend request and has 24 hours to respond @lazysuper do you have any more evidence? The full damage log screen shots would be better rather than just a snip, as it allows us to more easily see context.
  12. The player in question has been contacted via steam friend request and has 24 hours to respond.
  13. @Doc O'malley do you have any more evidence for this complaint? The evidence provided isn't enough, I do see the RDM manager up in one screen shot but, there's no damage logs, no context, and it doesn't say if it was a T or an inno, and as there's no mention of them attempting to metagame in the other evidence I will be forced to close and archive this complaint if you can not produce more evidence against them.
  14. The evidence Seems to show (in my opinion) that the player in question was in collusion with the other players present in order to get dailies done. This goes against our policy about metagaming which is expressly forbidden in the rules. Metagaming is defined as: Not playing the game the way it is meant to be played in order to complete an alternate objective. By stating "we getting challenges done" along with the rest of the context of the chat conversation, I have come to believe that they were in fact helping each other to complete dailies For this reason the player Mo Bomba moat.gg STEAM_0:0:121149080 Will receive a one day ban for metagaming 1st offense. Be careful out there.
  15. The evidence provided shows the player in question clearly admitting to working together with other players to get dailies. This is metagaming which is defined as: Not playing the game the way it is meant to be played in order to complete an alternate objective. This is clearly stated in the rules as being against the rules. The player in question Ozambran STEAM_0:0:75735315 Will receive a one day ban for metagaming 1st offense. Be careful out there.
×
×
  • Create New...