In regards to my now archived post complaint. I get theres no way to view the death scene but the fact the dude didnt report me as hes known for T baiting and then the slaying of myself. Does that no raise any alarm bells with their skills as staff?
- Show previous comments 2 more
It isnt just hear say. I posted evidence. The victim in relation is a now banned known troublemaker. They took poor action and didnt respond which is posted in screenshots which are solid proof. I dont even see how this is up for debate seeming as the deathscreen does not even matter now as the person who was T baiting is banned and has been slain numerous times for t baiting or kicked for mic spam.
The fact that you believe someone should be punished for something without evidence just because they have done it before and are "known for it" shows you don't understand that punishment goes by a case by case basis. Without any physical evidence or proof of them doing it AGAIN or in general, nothing will happen, and that is fair. Punishing someone without any evidence is unfair to the person being punished.
- Agree x 1
Your "evidence" is just you talking about the situation. Anyone can talk about what happened, even if they are wrong, and post is as evidence. The fact that there was no proof showing that you were indeed shot at, and that Momo falsely slayed you, means that it is a he say/she say situation.
It all goes back to the fact you could have still easily been lying to get a staff punished, as there is no proof that Momo was in the wrong, just you saying that they were in the wrong. That is not solid proof, and it never will be.
"The deathscreen does not even matter now as the person who was T baiting is banned and has been slain numerous times for t baiting or kicked for mic spam" just because they did it before, doesn't mean they did it actually did it when you put up that complaint.
If you did something in the past and got punished for it, does that mean if someone accuses you of doing that exact same thing without any proof, that you should get punished for it? Would you think it would be fair if you got punished, even if you didnt do it, because the accuser said so without proper evidence?